< Обратно

Faced madness of the Russian life represented by Gorislavtsev audit and consulting group which is created by Inna and Konstantin Gorislavtsevymi. Gorislavtsev' family well illustrates as corpulent years of oil wellbeing fed various easy riders, which time comes to an end together with outrageous prices for domestic hydrocarbons. Once known auditor company, it seems, degraded to the sign what her former employees on the websites of comments on employers massively write about.

 

Gorislavtsev - it "personsthe ovek-holding", on it is registered JSC GORISLAVTSEV. AUDIT (income in 2018 — 8.7 million, expenses — 8.5 million), JSC Center Business-Consultinga (income in 2018 — 0 million, expenses — 0 million), JSC Auditor Firm Gorislavtsev i K. Audit (income in 2018 — 40.2 million, expenses — 40.2 million), LLC Kamberley International Consulting Group (sleeping), LLC Gorislavtsev i partnery (nowadays – LLC Rkt-Uran, goes bankrupt, balance in 2018 of 10.6 million, revenue of 7 thousand, net loss of 699 thousand). In addition, Marina Klopotovskaya (sister Gorislavtseva) owns a share in LLC GORISLAVTSEV.AUDIT (earlier Gorislavtsev, income in 2018 — 383 thousand, expenses — 593 thousand was the director and the founder), also Gorislavtsev was a founder of LLC Dzhi-online. Audit and is a founder of CJSC Dzhi-Service (income in 2018 — 10.7 million, expenses — 10.2 million). The latest news on the http://www.gorislavtsev.ru/ group website – of December 1, 2018, the last rating of 2015. Some companies find so far tenders where I dumpt also cut small orders.

Gorislavtsev had a rush to bear knowledge in masses, expressed in creation of Non-state non-profit educational institution "Institute of Business and Consulting" which undertook to develop at students of "Helicopter view". The latest news on the website of institute - of 2011, in 2019 it was liquidated. Inna Gorislavtsev was the teacher of the late institute, predictably,and, about which It is necessary to tell in more detail.

Follows from Gorislavtseva's interview that at the time as the consultant she appeared in an orbit of Sergey Lipatov, the ex-president of CJSC Transtelecom Company (2002-2010), the scandalous ex-chairman of the board of directors of FC Lokomotiv, and the plundered LLC CB Mezhtrastbank.

Of Gorislavtsev tells about Lipatov with aspiration in interviews which undertook even before its criminal cases when he was sufficient size. At Lipatov Gorislavtseva was responsible for corporate management.

Own developer business of Lipatov is a Grasse group of companies which he owned together with Ruben Hudoyan and the being director of Freight One Andrey Krapivin, now deceased. Apparently, Gorislavtseva was Lipatov's face value as the cofounder of Mezhtrastbank. In 2017 Lipatov was arrested on the case of embezzlement of investors of Mezhtrastbank. In turn, Gorislavtseva together with Igor Kuyda, Gabriel Yushvayev (Garik Makhachkala's) business partner, nearly flew under subsidiary responsibility in the claim of DIA to the controlling persons of Mezhtrastbank.

Gorislavtseva also participated in the corporate conflict around Grasse Group which badly ended for her boss who lost A1.

Gorislavtseva's ears are visible also in the agricultural project of Lipatov in Kaluga (LLC Agroprominvest) which ended with bankruptcy. Further "valuable experience" of Gorislavtseva about which she so liked to tell, and being in serving oddish Lipatov's interests, it was not too demanded in the market. Nowadays she virtually directs a certain virtual Center of legislative initiatives, traces of registration and which activity I did not find if not to carry to those Gorislavtseva's Instagram.

The vigorous aunt submitted the application on the competition "Leaders of Russia" that forces me to worry about our dearest Fatherland. It is possible to find valuable expert comments of "the public and political figure, the head of the Center of legislative initiatives Inna Gorislavtseva" who, for example, "noted that increase in the amount of payments to pensioners and other social and unprotected population groups is very important event on which the quality of life of many people depends" in network…

As far as I can judge, Gorislavtsev' companies had a period of take-off which fell on the 90th years. The market of auditor and consulting services was only formed, young and vigorous green light burned. In obviously advertizing interviews ("you?! But you, with your consulting experience, need to learn, but not to study MBA …") it is claimed that Gorislavtseva somehow participated in development of the Privatization program in Russia and the project of reforming of Ministry of Railways. Both projects are doubtfully good though participation in them says that the family some time was near large corruption processes.

Apparently, business was double – as consulting, and cashing in of means. What ratio of cashing in and consultations - it is difficult to tell, the side is thin. In that case that drew my attention – the share of an obnal is close to 100%. Besides honourable the whole assembly of faceless legal persons, like LLC Alaks, OSOO "KLAYT", LLC GARLAND, LLC AMBLER, LLC SKEYT, LLC BIART, CJSC ALLYUR, LLC RUNO, LLC Flipper, LLC STEYMAN, LLC KOLUBER, LLC GERLAND, LLC LOKIT, etc. hangs on Inna Gorislavtseva that, as a rule, becomes for the purpose of creation of chains for an obnal and tax optimization. This hypothesis is confirmed by participation of the family company in the case of "red laundresses". Newspapers of that time so describe this story: "Valery Sklyar — the leader of the underground left organization Revolutionary Military Council which made a noise at the time was one of the main participants of investigation. In 1998 he was arrested for a number of terrorist attacks, but then released on recognizance. When over Sklyar the court began, he, according to SK, in passing with campaigns on process successfully worked in "laundry" and managed to participate in legalization of at least several tens of millions dollars during this time. In spite of the fact that all members of Revolutionary Military Council were condemned a year ago, and this business is handed already over in archive, in the history of "revolutionaries" as now it became clear, not all riddles were resolved. According to official data of the investigation, created RVS in the early nineties the editor-in-chief of the Molodoy Kommunist newspaper Igor Gubkin. Besides it Valery Sklyar, the economist by training, and even the employee of a central board of the Ministry of Internal Affairs on fight against organized crime Vladimir Belashev entered the leading cell of the organization. Revolutionary Military Council became famous after his activists blew up a monument to Nicholas II, and then mined a monument to Peter I of work of Zurab Tsereteli on Krymskaya Embankment". According to the Ministry of Internal Affairs, they used various schemes of legalization. On the simplest, firms clients signed with Fluran (accounts of firm were generally opened in Novator bank) contracts that the Ltd company allegedly will render them some services — on repair of offices, mediation at the conclusion of transactions, to studying any given markets, etc. It is clear, that no works were performed as Fluran was frankly lime structure — the firm was registered on the passport of the alcoholic Muscovite Egorychev who spent on drink the document still in the late nineties (he on interrogation just could not remember that he happened to its passport). However such contracts gave an official reason to transfer the large sums into accounts Fluran. Almost right after similar operations as investigators found out, money was withdrawn by cash from account Fluran in various banks (usually, in Novator) and just carried away in suitcases. It is remarkable that contracts with Fluran on rendering doubtful works signed among other and rather known structures. So, the auditor company "Gorislavtsev and To. Audit" signed a number of contracts with Fluran on payment of a large reward for assistance in signing of the contracts to it with clients".

The touching naivety of the scheme with Fluran is harmoniously complemented with a revelation of Gorislavtsev who in an interview to the Vremya Novostey newspaper reported that he rolled away means to the management of Novator: "The head of the company "Gorislavtsev and To." Konstantin Gorislavtsev confirmed audit to us that he was interrogated in SK, and in its firm dredging was carried out. At the same time he noted that he is connected to the case only as the witness. "We cooperated at the time with Novator bank — Mr. Gorislavtsev told. — In particular, his representatives recommended our auditor company to many other firms which became then our clients. We for such help financially encouraged Novator whose representatives asked the commission to list Flurana from the sums of the signed contracts. I even was not interested what the firm as we with it did not run any business is, and just transferred a reward for the provided services there".

Big money, most likely, led to the fact that by 2009 at Gorislavtsev "the roof moved down". The certificate to that is the developed interview to Kommersant under the heading "Audit, Water and Oil" in which the auditor ("the strong brought-up man in summer wide trousers, a t-shirt and sandals barefoot") in all seriousness inspires some infernal game. Gorislavtsev said that he created the Center of improvement of soul and developed a technique which helps people to move to the following level of existence. "In day of an interview I arrived by 9 in the morning to special occupation (one more requirement of Gorislavtsev) and together with the staff of his company an hour and a half practiced yoga, chi kung, oriental martial arts and usual morning exercises. According to Gorislavtsev, done had to "expand and ennoble" my consciousness. Only after all this I, the person writing "about such low substance as earning money" was allowed to a body". "Gorislavtsev began to read ancient books, manuscripts, to study tables. Having got used to a role of the researcher, was read by Indian "Mahabharata", the Tibetan "Book by the dead". Reading wise books before going to bed became a part of its vital diet. In parallel Gorislavtsev began to study the system of improvement of an organism created by Porfiry Ivanov. The businessman considers that he only tempered by a body is capable to become the harmonious personality. Each morning and evening he dives into an ice-hole near the house in Strogino, runs barefoot on snow, has a shower bath cold water".

"But by and large the Gorislavtsev and To company is not so much business for the owner how many the experimental platform. Gorislavtsev already acquainted fifteen employees (nearly a half of office) with the way of life and calls them "my pupils". Especially for them at work in the mornings two times a week classes are.

— This voluntary business? Or you exhaust with a whip?

— Well-at-at — Gorislavtsev grins and interrogatively raises hands up. — Someone, someone should be forced sometimes. I recommend to them to make and, to read something divine. I over them as the father over children.

"Many do not want to be engaged, do not want to develop, they want to sleep, want to be lazy. The animal beginning gets absolute the best of Homo sapiens" — according to Gorislavtsev, the staff of the company who does not attend class, go sleepy more often and even energetically they are less stable.

Gorislavtsev does not exclude that the "Center of improvement of soul" concentrated so far in the company can develop into business. Though health is also invaluable, but the auditor with companions made initial assessment: the monthly course of occupations (two times a week) costs 1-7 thousand rubles depending on the teacher. "But so far all this is only future" — Gorislavtsev says.

In Bryusovy Lane in the Temple of revival there is an icon of the 17th century "Collecting the dead". Gorislavtsev tells about it blissful whisper. Facing this icon, he a few years ago asked for himself life up to 120 years. After that from above information began "to come as to make it: so and so, thus". Perhaps having such contacts, Konstantin Gorislavtsev and the truth will construct business on improvement of soul".

It is possible to connect it only with the general pelevinsky spirit of the Russian life and unconditional value of the auditor press which that is more valuable, than higher to donate readiness a name for the sake of money.

Gorislavtsev's business was stratified on slightly similar in the name and functionality of desks to approximately equally sad quality of services. Not to be unfounded solved vzto look, what LLC Gorislavtsev i partnery which bashfully replaced the name with "Rkt-Uran" and went to bankruptcy was engaged in.

In founders only one Gorislavtsev (without partners), the address according to FTS – "left", balance as of 2018 – 10.6 million rubles, revenue – 7 thousand, net loss – 699 thousand rubles, average number – two persons, probably, are artists-auditors Gorislavtsev and his wife. 

The Novocherkassk plant of the petrochemical equipment "Escort" which nowadays rested after the long-term corporate conflict of founding fathers Vladimir Baziyan and Leonid Tavrovsky, and followed after this bankruptcies was Gorislavtsev's client under contract No. 1-015/17 of 01.02.2017. To Gorislavtsev from the dying plant nearly 14 million on rendering legal services arrived. The lion's share of this money, according to information from my source, was spent as follows:

· Elena Grigoryevna Getmanenko (represented by LLC Center of Audit and Consulting) Orenburg, the ex-director of non-profit partnership Gorislavtseva of rescue of human souls "Assistance to improvement of human health "New evolution of CHELO-VEKA. Live life", received 1.7 million rubles under the contract for rendering unknown marketing services.

· LLC Stroy-Techno (INN 7716791606) received 1.6 million for building materials.

· LLC NPK Stream (INN 7730561192) received 4.3 million for contract construction works.

· LLC OSTERIOON (INN 7715437313) received 1.3 million rent.

Other money dispersed on a trifle and is unclear where, from them most of all got to a certain Alexander Valentinovich Khrapov (nearly one million) and nearly 300 the SP to Gorislavtseva Inna left that is predictable. Got and connected with Gorislavtsevy LLC Dzhi. Online. Audit and CJSC Dzhi-Service. What for services were provided to the dying plant? This knows to anybody, but how money dispersed – Gorislavtsev sometimes goes down from mountain tops of spirit on the transitory earth behind money of the clients and spends them unclear as. 

The fact that consequences of communication of Gorislavtsev with the otherworldly worlds were extremely regrettable convincingly follows from the inspection statement Federal Treasury No. 001900887342 of JSC GORISLAVTSEV I K. AUDIT. Each point is fine here, I quote:   

1. "When planning audit of accounting (financial) records by the auditor (lead auditor) of JSC Gorislavtsev i K. Audit the general strategy of audit which is not reflecting the volume, the period and the general orientation of audit and also being a basis for development of the plan of audit is developed.

2. In the general plan made within audit of accounting (financial) records and the program of audit time frames of the planned auditor procedures are not defined, also in the general plan of audit the planned auditor procedures are not in full specified.

3. Within audit of financial statements by the auditor and management of the audited face consent concerning conditions of carrying out audit regarding carrying out the specified audit according to federal standards of auditor activity not fully is reached and also the specified conditions are not reflected documentary in the contract of rendering auditor services.

4. In the audit report about accounting (financial) records, including a part "Important circumstances", the unambiguous reference to the corresponding paragraph of the explanatory note to financial (accounting) statements which have to allow users of accounting (financial) records to find reflection of this circumstance in accounting records is not contained (the size of net assets less authorized capital).

5. In the working paper about independence of the auditor on an auditor task within audit of accounting (financial) records the start date and the ends of rendering services in audit is not specified.

6. Working papers of the auditor do not contain conclusions concerning non-compliance by the checked face of requirements of the Federal law "About Joint-stock Companies" regarding not disclosure of information on results of the analysis of the reasons and factors which, according to the board of directors (supervisory board) of society, led to the fact that the cost of net assets of society appeared less than its authorized capital; the list died on reduction of cost of net assets of society in compliance with the size of its authorized capital; and also results of discussion of these cases with the management of the audited face and if it is appropriate, representatives of the owner of the audited face, other authorized persons of the audited face. - Working papers of the auditor do not contain the auditor's assessment on observance by the audited face of requirements of the Federal law "About Joint-stock Companies" regarding reduction of authorized capital.

7. In the working papers made during audits of accounting (financial) records there are no data about taking place of non-compliance by the audited face of requirements of regulations for drawing up accounting records, in particular, requirements to disclosure of information and also results of discussion of it with the management of the audited face.

8. In the working paper of the auditor "Survey quality check of performance of tasks on audit of accounting records" made within audit of accounting (financial) records there are no conclusions of the person designated for conducting survey quality check of performance of a task by results of procedures of survey check and also does not provide documentary registration of the fact that the said person knows of the issues resolved during performance of a task which could lead it to a conclusion that the significant judgments and conclusions created by auditor group are inadequate.

9. The letter representation on audit of accounting (financial) records is not dated.

10. The survey quality check of performance of a task which is carried out within audit of accounting (financial) records not fully captured questions of compliance to the performed work which formed a basis for formation of the significant judgments and the drawn conclusions, independence assessment and also compliances of the draft of the audit report to conditions of a concrete task chosen for the analysis of working papers of the auditor.

11. As a part of documentation submitted to check there is no documentary confirmation of holding procedures concerning the following essential objects of audit (according to the pro-audited reporting submitted to check): fixed assets, other non-current assets, stocks, receivables, money and money equivalents, authorized capital, retained earnings (uncovered loss), borrowed funds (short-term and long-term), accounts payable, revenue, cost of sales, gross profit (loss), management expenses, other income and expenses; - JSC Gorislavtsev i K. Audit did not carry out auditor procedures, except auditor procedures for assessment of independence and acceptance on customer support (continuation of cooperation with already existing client).

12. In case of selection of specific elements by audit organization the need for obtaining the adequate auditor evidence concerning the population rest is not analyzed.

13. The auditor violated the requirement to an order of execution of working papers, including drawing up working papers without indication of dates of their creation.

14. The auditor participating in audit of accounting records of the organization specified in Part 3 of Article 5 of the Federal Law on Auditing carried out a number of auditor procedures, having at the time of carrying out audit, only the valid qualification certificate of the auditor issued according to the Federal law of August 7, 2001 No. 119-FZ "About Auditor Activity".

15. The control system of quality of tasks established in JSC Gorislavtsev i K. Audit and also the principles and procedures concerning a quality control system element "monitoring" regarding selective inspections of complete tasks, not fully provide reasonable confidence that tasks are performed according to standards of auditor activity and requirements of regulations of the Russian Federation in the considered part.

16. The principles and procedures established in JSC Gorislavtsev i K. Audit not fully provide reasonable confidence that tasks are performed according to standards of auditor activity and requirements of regulations of the Russian Federation and also that the audit reports and other reports issued by audit organization correspond to conditions of a concrete task.

17. To the audit report about accounting (financial) records undated explanations are attached to accounting (financial) records.

18. In JSC Gorislavtsev i K. Audit the principles and procedures designed to provide reasonable confidence that it possesses the personnel, sufficient by quantity, owning necessary knowledge, the experience observing ethical principles capable to perform tasks according to federal rules (standards) of auditor activity and requirements of regulations of the Russian Federation are not fully observed; - JSC Gorislavtsev i K. Audit does not fully observe the established principles and procedures covering the following elements of personnel work: assessment of results of the performed work, professional skills of workers, professional competence and professional development; - the principles and procedures providing confidence in functioning of an element of a control system of quality "Personnel resources" established in audit organization did not provide appropriate documenting in the checked period.

19. JSC Gorislavtsev i K. Audit did not submit in time and in full data (information) which are provided by the law and it is necessary for implementation of its lawful activity by Federal Treasury.

20. JSC Gorislavtsev i K. Audit is not provided storage of the documents (copies of the documents) received and (or) made during rendering auditor services within not less than five years now after a year in which they were received and made; - introduced in JSC Gorislavtsev i K. Audit of the politician and the procedure regarding storage of documentation of the auditor are not observed in practice and do not provide reliable storage, integrity, availability and a possibility of extraction of documentation on a task; - after date of the audit report the auditor in due time did not collect auditor documentation in the auditor file and did not complete administrative procedures the final formation of the auditor file.

The similar epitaph is written out by Federal Treasury and to other company of Gorislavtsev (check No. 001900887344 in February, 2019):

1. The analysis of the ratios and regularities concerning comparability of numerical indicators of accounting (financial) records of the specified organizations is not carried out. The lead auditor did not exercise timely supervision of the course of performance of each stage of audit.

2. In case of selection of specific elements by audit organization the need for obtaining the adequate auditor evidence concerning the population rest is not analyzed

3. In general plans and programs of audit are not considered and the questions specified in the subparagraph "and", "in", "", "е" Paragraph 9 FPSAD No. 3 are not taken into account that does not allow to consider the presented plans of audit of the above-stated auditor tasks rather detailed to serve as the management when developing the program of audit, and programs of audit as a set of instructions for the auditor who is carrying out check.

4. In the working paper of the auditor "Survey quality check of performance of tasks on audit of accounting records" there are no conclusions of the person designated for conducting survey quality check of performance of a task by results of procedures of survey check and also does not provide documentary registration of the fact that the said person does not knows of questions, unresolved during performance of a task, which could lead it to a conclusion that the significant judgments and conclusions created by auditor group are inadequate.

5. Auditor procedures on the basis of which the conclusions which are a basis for opinion of the auditor in the audit report are created are not carried out and are not documented.

6. Storage of the documents (copies of the documents) received and (or) made during rendering auditor services is not provided. Confidence that each element of a control system of quality functions properly is not provided.

7. The principles and procedures designed to provide reasonable confidence that it possesses the personnel, sufficient by quantity, owning necessary knowledge, the experience observing ethical principles capable to perform tasks according to federal rules (standards) of auditor activity and requirements of regulations of the Russian Federation are not fully observed. The established principles and procedures covering the following elements of personnel work are not fully observed. The principles and procedures providing confidence in functioning of an element of a control system of quality "Personnel resources" established in audit organization did not provide appropriate documenting in the checked period.

8. The flowing consideration and assessment of a control system of quality do not cover questions of the analysis of accounting of corresponding changes by audit organization in the standards of auditor activity and regulations of the Russian Federation concerning the principles and procedures of a control system of quality, written confirmation of respect for the principles and procedures of independence.

9. The auditor expressed unmodified opinions on reliability of the pro-audited otchetnost for lack of appropriate disclosure of information

10. In a number of working papers of the auditor there are no dates of their drawing up.

I will note that Gorislavtsev is, allegedly, a board member of the Moscow auditor chamber if to trust his website, but not the website of the Chamber where it as the board member is not specified. It consists in the Russian society of appraisers and NP Institute of Professional Auditors. And there is a wish to ask these reputable organizations — whether it is worth detaining so spiritualized person how Gorislavtsev, in so prosy sphere how audit and assessment? Perhaps it is worth releasing finally him to light tops of spirit?.